How Much Money Can I Get If I Was Hit By A Company Truck On The Freeway And Broke My Leg

A report found that the median award in rear-end truck blow cases is $93,909. Remarkably, plaintiffs recover damages in 63 percentage of hit from backside truck accident cases that go to verdict.

Why so depression? This is the median truck accident verdict, not the boilerplate settlement payout. The boilerplate verdict will be college than the median verdict. Nosotros take not seen average rear-terminate truck crash data (we estimate beneath), but nosotros practice know that 12% of the verdicts in rear-finish truck blow cases are over $1 million.  These are national statistics but our lawyers think these statistics hold upward well for Maryland.

A more than pressing question might be how do victims only win 63% of these hit from behind cases. That is a tough question to reply. Bad lawyers or people unrepresented past counsel? Certainly, defense lawyers representing trucking companies have a lot of tricks up their sleeve but this 63% number makes no sense.

Our police force firm, Miller & Zois, has never lost a rear-finish truck accident merits (or any truck blow claim, for that matter, while securing millions of dollars for our clients.)

Machine Blow Values Are Generally Less Merely...

Okay, and then what if you were not in a truck crash, just a motorcar accident. There is no information available that our lawyers have seen that shows the boilerplate rear-cease settlement or verdict for a rear-finish accident.

You tin expect, in general, terms, the settlement payout to be less just considering the forcefulness of the collision acquired by cars is commonly less than you lot run into in large rig crash cases.

In Maryland, the median - equally opposed to average - accident payout in a verdict is around $12,000. This means that most car crash cases that become to trial in Maryland are non serious injury or death cases.

Then you accept to look more at the type of harm as opposed to the mechanism of injury to make up one's mind how much coin you will get in compensation. That's the better test. Juries don't care how the standoff happened. They want to know how injure yous are.

How Much Is Average Payout in a Rear-End Truck Accident Example?

Our truck accident lawyers estimate the average settlement value of a truck accident instance involving a rear-end collision (where a truck rear-ends another vehicle) is around $150,000 to $200,000.  But verbal statistics are not available.  Most lawyer prefer median verdict data. The median jury honour in rear-end truck accident cases is $93,909 and 12% of verdicts in these cases are over $1 one thousand thousand.

What Impacts the Value of a Rear-End Truck Accident Instance?

The chief factor that drives the settlement value of a rear-end truck accident instance is the extent and severity of the plaintiff's physical injuries. If the plaintiff suffers serious, permanent injuries such every bit a brain injury, ruptured spleen, or broken leg, the potential value of their case will be much college.

If You Get Rear-Concluded past a Truck, Is It Ever the Truck Driver's Fault?

If a truck hits you lot from behind, the truck commuter is almost e'er going to be institute to be responsible for the blow. The truck commuter has a duty to maintain a safe distance from vehicles in front then that he can stop the truck in fourth dimension to avert a collision. There are some limited instances where the truck driver may not be at-fault in a rear-end collision, such equally failure to yield.

Rear-Finish Truck Blow Verdicts and Settlements

Beneath are a few sample rear-cease truck accident verdicts and settlement to give yous some idea of how lawyers and juries are determining the worth of rear-stop car accidents.

Do not extrapolate too much from these examples. The axiom "every case is different" really does use hither.

But while at that place is no predictive value in how much of a payout you will get, looking at verdicts and settlements does give you a deeper lens into the possible range of compensation payouts for a particular example, particularly when used in conjunction with other case value evaluation tools.

• 2020, California: $three.5 Million Verdict: This is a archetype rear-end truck accident case. The victim is hit by a tractor-trailer transporting liquid nitrogen. Plaintiff refuses intendance at the scene, a fact that the defendant later tries to shove down his throat. He suffers a herniated disc at the L5-S1 level with radicular pain down his legs. He gets a lumbar fusion requiring the insertion of plates and pedicle screws. He has $880,000 in medical bills which his own practiced concedes should have been about $632,000. The defendant's insurance company, Prosight, was able to get an expert to testify that the bills should accept been $174,000. He also brings a claim for time to come medical care and life care needs. The jury awards $532,000 in past medical bills, $500,000 in future medical bills, $282,288 in by lost earnings, $900,000 in future lost wages, $500,000 for past pain and suffering,  and $750,000 for hereafter pain and suffering.

• 2015, Michigan: $1,365,000 Settlement: A soon-to-be-married couple is driving on the highway when their car experiences a mechanical failure. They turn on their hazard lights and brainstorm to slow downwardly. A commercial semi-truck apace approaches from behind and slams into their vehicle. The automobile immediately catches burn down and is pushed along the interstate. Unfortunately, both occupants succumb to their injuries, prompting their estates to file a wrongful death suit against the trucking company. They criminate that the commuter was not paying attention and did not fifty-fifty realize when he struck their vehicle. The driver admits to not being circumspect, pregnant the simply issue is damages. The parties agree to a $1,365,000 settlement.
• 2014, Virginia: $920,000 Verdict: A 57-twelvemonth-former information analyst is driving forth I-66 in Virginia when traffic begins to slow. A commercial tractor-trailer rear-ends her vehicle with the front of the truck entering the dorsum seat of the adult female'south vehicle. She suffers a traumatic head injury and a balmy brain injury in addition to soft-tissue damage to her trunk. When she sues the trucking company, they allege that she pulled out in front end of the truck, thus causing the accident. Eye-witnesses refute that claim, and the defendants are determined to be at fault. After a four-day trial, the jury returns a verdict for the plaintiff for $920,000.
• 2014, Maryland: $743,000 Verdict: The rider of a small SUV decides to reach for something in the backseat of her car when the driver stops at a blood-red lite. At the exact moment that she unbuckles her seat chugalug to exercise so, a concrete truck crashes into the dorsum of her vehicle. The force of the impact throws the passenger into the windshield of the SUV, which results in back and cervix injuries. She is transported via ambulance to the hospital where MRIs reveal disc herniation and tears. Doctors predict that she volition require surgery in the future. She sues the physical company for negligence, claiming that the truck was traveling too fast and should have slowed downwards when budgeted the intersection. A Harford County jury returned a verdict for $743,000.
• 2013, Maryland: $2,301,250 Verdict: An occupational therapist is driving in Hagerstown on the mode to our customer's house. The automobile in front of her intended to make a left turn, prompting her to tedious down. As she slowed down, a truck rear-ends her vehicle. After the accident, the adult female feels severe pain from a headache immediately. She is treated for whiplash and a concussion and also develops symptoms of vertigo. She hires a personal injury lawyer and files a lawsuit, claiming that vertigo prevents her from doing her chore since she often has trouble getting to her clients' homes. She claims that she has hundreds of episodes of vertigo each year. Afterward she sues the trucking visitor, they allege that she was responsible for the accident past not turning on her turn signal. At a demote trial, though, the judge determines that she was slowing for the motorcar in forepart of her as opposed to turning left, and then signaling was not required. The judge awards a verdict of $two,301,250
• 2011, Maryland: $750,000 Settlement: A man on a motorcycle was rear-ended by a commercial truck, causing his instant death. This instance highlights how in some wrongful death cases in Maryland it's hard to obtain a fair recovery because of the ridiculous cap on non-economical damages. Our police business firm, Miller & Zois, handled this case.
• Valuing truck blow cases: this is some other one of those valuation tools that can assistance you meliorate understand the range of value for your claim
• Get verdicts and settlements (including more Miller & Zois verdicts) in Maryland (and some more contempo results)

Hiring Our Truck Accident Lawyers

If you lot take been seriously injured - nosotros handle just serious injury and wrongful death claims - in a car, truck, or motorcycle accident, we may be able to help y'all. You lot can get a free online consultation, or you tin can call our car and truck blow lawyers at800-553-8082.

Source: https://www.millerandzois.com/rear-end-average-settlement.html

Posted by: jefferysionuirt.blogspot.com

Share this post